Comparative Financial Performance Evaluation of Public and Private Sector Banks using Camels

Dr Vodnala Chandramouly

doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.40566

Comparative Financial Performance Evaluation of Public and Private Sector Banks using Camels

Author(s)	Dr Vodnala Chandramouly
Country	India
Abstract	The banking sector plays a pivotal role in the economy by facilitating financial intermediation, channelling funds from savers to borrowers and supporting economic growth and development. In India, the banking landscape is diverse mix of public sector banks, private sector banks, and cooperative banks, each contributing to the country's financial ecosystem. The evaluation of banks' financial performance is critical for stakeholders, including investors, regulators, policymakers, and bank management, to gauge their overall health and resilience. Traditional financial metrics and models provide valuable insights into banks' performance; however, they may lack the depth and granularity required to assess various aspects comprehensively. In this context, the CAMELS model emerges as a robust framework for evaluating banks' performance across multiple dimensions, including Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Quality, Earnings Quality, Liquidity Position, and Sensitivity to Market Risk. By employing the CAMELS model, researchers and practitioners can conduct a holistic assessment of banks' strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. The research objectives include assessing the applicability and effectiveness of the CAMELS model, measuring and analyzing the financial performance of selected banks, determining their ranking based on CAMELS ratios, and identifying strategies to enhance their overall performance. Through rigorous analysis and empirical investigation, this study aims to address several research questions pertaining to the effectiveness of the CAMELS model, the specific financial indicators employed, the comparison of financial performances among selected banks, and the identification of key strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, the study formulates hypotheses to test various financial ratios and parameters, providing empirical evidence to support its findings and recommendations.
Keywords	Key words: Capital Adequacy, liquidity, Earnings Quality, Sensitivity to market, CAMELS
Field	Business Administration
Published In	Volume 7, Issue 4, July-August 2025
Published On	2025-07-13
DOI	https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.40566
Short DOI	https://doi.org/g9s892

View / Download PDF File

E-ISSN 2582-2160

doi

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads

Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 4 Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 3 Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 2

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA

About IJFMR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9687-828-838	editor@ijfmr.com

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Comparative Financial Performance Evaluation of Public and Private Sector Banks using Camels

Share this