International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 7, Issue 2 (March-April 2025) Submit your research before last 3 days of April to publish your research paper in the issue of March-April.

Enhancing Arbitration: Recent Developments in the UNCITRAL Working Group’s Efforts to Improve Efficiency and Quality.

Author(s) Ms. Nupur Verma, Dr. Kalpana Devi
Country India
Abstract In recent years, international arbitration has come under the microscope for its costs, lengthy processes, and perceived inefficiencies, sparking a worldwide push for reform. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has been proactive in tackling these issues through its Working Groups—especially Working Group II (Dispute Settlement) and Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform). This paper delves into the latest developments in UNCITRAL’s ongoing efforts to improve both the efficiency and quality of international arbitration.
The research kicks off by placing UNCITRAL’s role in the global arbitration scene into context, highlighting its significant influence in standardizing international legal norms. It then takes a closer look at specific reforms that UNCITRAL has introduced or proposed, such as the 2021 Expedited Arbitration Rules, advancements in procedural efficiency, digitalization initiatives, improvements in transparency, and new mechanisms for early dismissal and summary procedures. The study also considers the implications of UNCITRAL’s Code of Conduct for Arbitrators, which focuses on ethics, impartiality, and conflict-of-interest standards aimed at enhancing trust in arbitration processes.
Emphasis is placed on the reform proposals from Working Group III, especially those concerning investor-state arbitration. This includes ideas like creating a standing multilateral investment court, establishing appellate mechanisms, and incorporating mediation and alternative dispute resolution methods to complement traditional arbitration.
By analysing UNCITRAL documents, reports, and discussions, along with insights from arbitration professionals and academics, this paper assesses the potential of these reforms to tackle the main criticisms of international arbitration. It argues that while these reforms represent a significant step forward, their real-world success will depend on widespread acceptance, consistent application, and a careful balancing of stakeholder interests.
Published In Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April 2025
Published On 2025-04-14
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.41444
Short DOI https://doi.org/g9fm3c

Share this