
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 2
March-April 2025
Indexing Partners



















Enhancing Arbitration: Recent Developments in the UNCITRAL Working Group’s Efforts to Improve Efficiency and Quality.
Author(s) | Ms. Nupur Verma, Dr. Kalpana Devi |
---|---|
Country | India |
Abstract | In recent years, international arbitration has come under the microscope for its costs, lengthy processes, and perceived inefficiencies, sparking a worldwide push for reform. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has been proactive in tackling these issues through its Working Groups—especially Working Group II (Dispute Settlement) and Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform). This paper delves into the latest developments in UNCITRAL’s ongoing efforts to improve both the efficiency and quality of international arbitration. The research kicks off by placing UNCITRAL’s role in the global arbitration scene into context, highlighting its significant influence in standardizing international legal norms. It then takes a closer look at specific reforms that UNCITRAL has introduced or proposed, such as the 2021 Expedited Arbitration Rules, advancements in procedural efficiency, digitalization initiatives, improvements in transparency, and new mechanisms for early dismissal and summary procedures. The study also considers the implications of UNCITRAL’s Code of Conduct for Arbitrators, which focuses on ethics, impartiality, and conflict-of-interest standards aimed at enhancing trust in arbitration processes. Emphasis is placed on the reform proposals from Working Group III, especially those concerning investor-state arbitration. This includes ideas like creating a standing multilateral investment court, establishing appellate mechanisms, and incorporating mediation and alternative dispute resolution methods to complement traditional arbitration. By analysing UNCITRAL documents, reports, and discussions, along with insights from arbitration professionals and academics, this paper assesses the potential of these reforms to tackle the main criticisms of international arbitration. It argues that while these reforms represent a significant step forward, their real-world success will depend on widespread acceptance, consistent application, and a careful balancing of stakeholder interests. |
Published In | Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April 2025 |
Published On | 2025-04-14 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.41444 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/g9fm3c |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
