International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 5 (September-October 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of October to publish your research paper in the issue of September-October.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Preserving Judicial Independence in India: A Constitutional Critique of the Appointment Process

Author(s) Mr. Proteek Motilal, Ms. Swati Kaushal
Country India
Abstract The exercise of judicial power of a court of law is hinges for constitutional democracy and rule of law. This study critically analyzes the framework of judicial appointment in India from an executive overshadowed perspective to a judge-centered collegium paradigm constructed through judicial activism. The study focuses on the constitutional provisions, prominent constitutional legislations including, the First, Second and Third Judges Cases and the NJAC judgment, alongside judicial doctrines like the Basic Structure Doctrine and exposes how freedom of judicial independence has been guaranteed and protected. The paper posits that important decision-making disabilities apply at any stage in restrictive scope but primary bestowing authority to the judicial arms is compulsory, the existing collegium system is incapable of rational systems to accountability devoid of representation or ease of access, and transparent processes. Relying primarily on doctrinal and cross-national examinations, this analysis reveals independent yet responsible notions of governance in India and demonstrates the sovereign pressures in assuming such powers. The study suggests measures aimed at strengthening accusations of judicial independence and impartiality while defending institutional reputation, credibility, and democratic soundness of the mechanism in its controls.
Keywords Judicial Independence, Collegium System, NJAC, Basic Structure Doctrine, Constitutional Law, Judicial Appointments, Supreme Court of India, Judicial Accountability, Indian Constitution, Judges Cases, Constitutional Supremacy.
Published In Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April 2025
Published On 2025-04-27
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.42560
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals