International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 7, Issue 3 (May-June 2025) Submit your research before last 3 days of June to publish your research paper in the issue of May-June.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 7 Issue 3
May-June 2025

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Judicial Function in SEC v. Jarkesy VS. Quasi-Judicial Function in NSDL v. SEBI: Doctrinal Parallels

Author(s) Dr. Harsha Rajwanshi
Country India
Abstract This article analyses the role of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as a regulatory agency with a varied role of legislative, executive, and adjudicatory functions. It reviews the decision of the Supreme Court of India in National Securities Depository Ltd. v. SEBI, (2017) 5 SCC 517, whereby the Court in its judicial oversight analyses the SEBI’s legislative framework, the SEBI Act, to delineate its distinct functions conferred upon the regulator under various statutory provisions within SEBI Act. The Court’s inquiry underscores the extent to which judicial deference is warranted in the context of regulatory authority, thereby illustrating the judiciary’s active role in shaping regulatory governance. The article draws a comparative parallel with the 2024 decision of the United States Supreme Court in SEC v. Jarkesy, highlighting how core legal principles remain central to regulatory analysis, even within different legal frameworks and economic structures. Through this comparison, the article provides evidence on how judicial engagement continues to influence and redefine the contours of regulatory power through enduring legal principles.
Keywords SEBI, Quasi-Judicial Functions, NSDL v. SEBI, SEC v. Jarkesy, Judicial Functions, Regulators, Securities Market, Securities Law, Separation of Powers, Securities litigation.
Published In Volume 7, Issue 3, May-June 2025
Published On 2025-06-11
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.47440
Short DOI https://doi.org/g9qp4g
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 3Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 1

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com