
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
ICCE (2025)
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 3
May-June 2025
Indexing Partners



















The Influencer Equity Equation: Analyzing Influencer Marketing's Effect on Brand Equity via the Perspectives of Authenticity, Credibility, and Engagement
Author(s) | Dr. Simon Suwanzy Dzreke, Ms. Semefa Elikplim Dzreke |
---|---|
Country | United States |
Abstract | The rapid expansion of influencer marketing necessitates a paradigm change from tactical execution to strategic brand equity architecture. To resolve long-standing theoretical ambiguities regarding how influencers create sustainable brand value, this study presents and empirically validates the Influencer Equity Transfer Model (IETM), a comprehensive framework. We show that brand equity arises from the synergistic interdependence of credibility, authenticity, and engagement rather than from discrete strategies by combining source credibility theory, elaboration likelihood pathways, social identity dynamics, and trust transfer mechanics. Importantly, a significant multiplicative interaction (β = 0.31, p <.001) that increases purchase intention by 26% beyond additive predictions (F(1,168) = 12.8, η² = 0.07) indicates that authenticity functions as a catalytic multiplier, validating credibility through economically rooted costly signaling mechanisms. Reach-based selection paradigms are fundamentally challenged by this synergy, which explains the disproportionate impact of micro-influencers (βauthenticity = 0.63 vs. 0.41 for mega-influencers). By emphasizing authenticity as a key component of high-elaboration processing, the IETM helps academics reconcile inconsistencies in the body of existing literature. It offers practitioners actionable architecture in the form of multifaceted credibility audits, authenticity protocols that incorporate vulnerability-driven storytelling (which increases brand recall by 22%) and organic disclosures (r = 0.42), and equity diagnostics that take the place of vanity metrics. Beyond business, research informs ethical governance—regulatory-aligned authenticity standards could improve marketplace trust while also reducing the documented negative effects of social media on mental health by normalizing imperfection. Boundary conditions include generational perception gaps and moderators of product involvement (βengagement→loyalty = 0.57 high vs. 0.32 low involvement). Cross-cultural validation, neuroscientific authentication, and virtual influencer adaptations must be given top priority in future studies. In attention economies where trust is the most valuable asset, this work reinterprets influencer marketing as strategic equity engineering, enabling brands to turn digital voices into lasting value. |
Keywords | Social media strategy, Micro-influencers, Brand equity, Engagement, Credibility, Authenticity, Trust transfer, Influencer marketing, and Expensive signaling |
Field | Business Administration |
Published In | Volume 7, Issue 3, May-June 2025 |
Published On | 2025-06-19 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.48683 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/g9qw86 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
