
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
AIMAR-2025
Conferences Published ↓
ICCE (2025)
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 4
July-August 2025
Indexing Partners



















Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Test vs Vibration Perception Tests for Detection of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Author(s) | Dr. Glaisa Angeles Claveria |
---|---|
Country | Philippines |
Abstract | Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a serious diabetic complication with high morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test (SWMT) and Vibration Perception Tests (VPT) in detecting DPN.Nine studies published between 2020 and 2024 were included, with heterogeneous populations and different methodologies. Effect sizes presented in the form of correlation coefficients (r), standardized mean differences (SMD), or diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were converted to a standard metric (Pearson's r) for amalgamation analysis. Random-effects meta-analytic models were used to aggregate diagnostic accuracy estimates, and heterogeneity between studies was tested using Q-statistics, I², and τ². The risk of bias was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled Fisher's z at 1.03 (95% CI: 0.11–1.94) is equivalent to a mean correlation coefficient of r = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.11–0.96), reflecting excellent diagnostic performance in both tests. Significant heterogeneity was evident (Q = 71.14, I² = 95.78%, τ² = 0.84). Subgroup analysis indicated that VPT has slightly higher sensitivity, while SWMT continues to be a useful screening test in the primary care setting, given its low cost and ease. Both VPT and SWMT are reliable for the detection of DPN. VPT potentially provides slightly better diagnostic accuracy, but SWMT is invaluable as a frontline screening tool, particularly in resource-poor settings. Both diagnostic methods together are recommended for complete assessment. |
Keywords | Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Test, Vibration perception test, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Diagnostic Accuracy |
Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
Published In | Volume 7, Issue 3, May-June 2025 |
Published On | 2025-06-25 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.49184 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/g9rskt |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
