
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
AIMAR-2025
Conferences Published ↓
ICCE (2025)
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 4
July-August 2025
Indexing Partners



















PUBLIC POLICY AND JUDICIARY: AN ANALYSIS OF CLASS-BIAS
Author(s) | Mr. Kishore Chandra Jena, Prof. Sudhansu Ranjan Mohapatra |
---|---|
Country | India |
Abstract | This essay is about what public police is and its different types and how states frame public policies. It also discusses the laws embodying public policies and judiciary and specifically Supreme Court responds towards the public policies. There are economic policies, social policies and policies in regard to political rights such as right to protest from which right to strike is derived. This essay deals with how judiciary has reacted to the contradictions between right to life and individual’s liberty. In A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, which was the first constitutional case brought the Supreme Court of India to the task of judging if the doctrine of substantial due process can be read into Article 21, Constitution of India. Scholars have found that the majority decision in this case has been set aside later on in Maneka Gandhi case. This essay also looks into the fact that when a matter of liberty versus preventive detention rises, the Court often sides with the state. On the other hand, a few cases such as Mohini Jain and Unikrishnan show that the Court has properly analyzed the question whether educational institutions run by private organizations can be made to enjoy complete freedom of immunity from state-interference and the Court has said that education is a sovereign responsibility and education can not be made trade and commerce. But contrary to this, in TMA Pai case, the Court reversed its earlier stand and said that state can not interfere in the management of the educational institutions fully run by private organizations. It means that the private educational institutions can impose sky rocketing price for admission and this decision of the Supreme Court went against the conscience of the constitution. So also, in respect of economic policies, the Court remained silent and it has never been assertive. This is how the Court is found biased in favour of the big business houses. |
Keywords | Public policy; Judiciary; Class bias; Supreme Court |
Field | Arts |
Published In | Volume 7, Issue 4, July-August 2025 |
Published On | 2025-07-20 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.51735 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/g9t2dg |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
