
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
AIMAR-2025
Conferences Published ↓
ICCE (2025)
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 4
July-August 2025
Indexing Partners



















The Role of English Language in Ruining the Talents of Indian Youth: A Critical Study
Author(s) | Dr. Sandeep Verma |
---|---|
Country | India |
Abstract | Abstract: The English language occupies a paradoxical position in contemporary India—it is both a gateway to global opportunities and a barrier to indigenous self-expression. This research paper critically examines how the dominance of English in the Indian education system and socio-economic life has contributed to the suppression of native talent, creativity, and identity among Indian youth. The central argument is that while English serves as a global lingua franca and facilitates communication across nations, its overemphasis in Indian education and employment sectors has led to systemic injustices, including linguistic discrimination, cultural alienation, and intellectual subjugation. The paper draws on historical, sociolinguistic, psychological, and educational perspectives to explore the multifaceted consequences of English language dominance, especially in the post-colonial Indian context. Historically, the imposition of English in India can be traced back to the infamous Minute on Indian Education (1835) by Thomas Babington Macaulay, who sought to create a class of Indians "Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect." Macaulay’s colonial vision restructured Indian education to prioritize English, marginalizing Sanskrit, Persian, Arabic, and regional languages. Post-independence India, instead of dismantling this colonial framework, largely continued it, further embedding English as a tool of elitism and a prerequisite for economic mobility. As a result, linguistic hierarchies were institutionalized, where English-medium education became synonymous with quality education, and vernacular-medium students were often treated as intellectually inferior or less competent. This paper contends that such a language policy has had far-reaching consequences for Indian youth. Many talented students from rural and non-English-speaking backgrounds face significant academic and professional disadvantages—not because of a lack of intelligence or creativity, but because they are forced to learn, think, and express themselves in a foreign language. The pressure to learn English for survival, employment, and social recognition has created an environment where language proficiency is valued more than knowledge, skill, or cultural rootedness. This has led to a tragic irony: the marginalization of India's own linguistic and intellectual traditions in the name of modern education. The psychological impact of English supremacy is equally profound. Students who struggle with English often experience low self-esteem, inferiority complexes, and feelings of social exclusion. They may internalize the belief that their lack of fluency in English equates to a lack of intelligence, which stifles their confidence and creativity. Moreover, English has become a symbol of social prestige, further widening the gap between urban elites and rural masses, between private English-medium school-goers and those educated in government schools. This linguistic divide is not just educational; it is socio-economic, cultural, and deeply ideological. The dominance of English also threatens the development and preservation of India’s rich linguistic diversity. Local languages, which carry centuries of cultural, philosophical, and literary traditions, are increasingly viewed as inferior or impractical. The lack of institutional support for mother tongues undermines efforts to cultivate talent and critical thinking in those languages. This not only restricts access to education and opportunities for a large segment of the population but also impoverishes the cultural fabric of the nation. By contrast, countries like Japan, Russia, China, South Korea, and Israel have achieved remarkable scientific, technological, and economic progress using their native languages. These nations demonstrate that intellectual and developmental excellence need not depend on English. Instead, progress rooted in one’s own language fosters deeper understanding, emotional resonance, and national pride. Bharatendu Harishchandra, the father of modern Hindi literature, rightly asserted that “the progress of one’s own language is the root of all progress.” Without the development of the mother tongue, true intellectual growth and cultural expression remain incomplete. This research also considers the role of Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS)—including Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Yoga, Nyaya, Mimamsa, and traditional poetics—as potential alternatives and complements to English-centric education. Sanskrit, the root of many Indian languages and the carrier of ancient Indian wisdom, has remained neglected in modern education. Reviving Sanskrit and integrating IKS into mainstream curricula can enhance students’ capacity for abstract thinking, ethical reasoning, and cultural connectedness. These systems offer a treasure trove of indigenous knowledge that can guide India’s self-reliant development in line with the vision of Aatmanirbhar Bharat. The paper further aligns its arguments with the progressive intentions of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which advocates education in the mother tongue, particularly in the foundational years. NEP-2020 provides a timely opportunity to correct the linguistic injustices of the past and redefine educational success in terms of comprehension, creativity, and critical thinking—rather than mere fluency in a colonial language. In conclusion, while English can and should retain its role as a link language for international communication, it must not dominate or dictate the terms of educational and intellectual development in India. A balanced and inclusive language policy that promotes multilingualism, respects regional languages, and revitalizes classical Indian languages like Sanskrit is imperative for unleashing the true potential of Indian youth. This linguistic decolonization is not merely a cultural necessity but a national imperative to ensure equitable access, cultural continuity, and authentic intellectual growth. Only by restoring pride in our native languages and nurturing talent in the language of thought and emotion can India realize the full promise of its demographic dividend. |
Keywords | Keywords: English language hegemony, linguistic colonialism, suppression of Indian youth talent, mother tongue education, National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, multilingualism in India, Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS), cultural alienation, language and social inequality, Sanskrit revival, vernacular medium vs English medium, educational linguistics, language and identity in India, Bharatendu Harishchandra, colonial legacy in Indian education. |
Field | Sociology > Linguistic / Literature |
Published In | Volume 7, Issue 4, July-August 2025 |
Published On | 2025-08-10 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.53181 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/g9w5g2 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
