
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
AIMAR-2025
Conferences Published ↓
ICCE (2025)
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 4
July-August 2025
Indexing Partners



















Constitutional protection of Personality Rights In The Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study Of India, EU And The US
Author(s) | Ms. Anmol Arora |
---|---|
Country | India |
Abstract | The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) and synthetic media tools has called into question classical concepts of personality rights, such as the right to one's name, image, voice, etc. In the face of more sophisticated AI-generated content, such as deepfakes and digital clones, this paper analyses how the constitutional and legal protection of personality rights is safeguarded under three jurisdictions—India, the European Union (EU) and the United States. Every jurisdiction is a different model influenced by its constitution, culture, and regulatory evolution. In India, the evolution of personality rights in constitutional and statutory law are largely fledgling, though courts are beginning to discover them through the doctrine of the right to privacy in Article 21. But the absence of laws or AI regulation meant there were large loopholes that allow the misuse of people’s digital identity. By contrast, the EU subscribes to a rights based approach based on dignity and privacy that is enshrined in the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights, and is implemented through mechanisms such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the proposed AI Act. These systems have some fairly substantial protections against unauthorized use of personal identities, including biometric identifiers and likenesses. The US is a bit murkier, accommodating personality rights with robust 1st Amendment protections. The right of publicity, a creature of state law, in fact affords commercial control over one’s persona, but its utility is significantly lessened by inconsistent enforcement and judges’ enforcement due to their veneration of freedom of expression. In the absence of a federal AI law (we have had many AI proposals but no bills passed), and little in the way of state-by-state harmony, AI-generated identity remedies are non-uniform and uncertain. This comparative analysis uncovers that, although the EU is at the forefront of integrated regulatory responses, India and the USA face constitutional dilemmas and legislative fragmentation. The paper calls for a finely balanced legal ecosystem that respects free expression while guaranteeing dignitary and commercial protections against AI-enabled identity manipulation.” It proposes harmonised legislative responses, clarification of the scope of personality rights in the digital sphere, and global cooperation in tackling the challenges that synthetic media technologies present on a transnational level. |
Keywords | Personality Rights, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Right to Privacy, Deepfakes and Synthetic Media, Comparative Constitutional Law, Data Protection and Regulation |
Published In | Volume 7, Issue 4, July-August 2025 |
Published On | 2025-08-10 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.53264 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/g9w5dv |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
