International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Perception of Smile Esthetics in the Digital Age: An Evaluation using Simulated Smile Parameters
| Author(s) | Dr. EVA V JOHN, Dr. MALTHESH B S, Dr. CHIDANANDESWARA G ., Dr. RAMESH G C, Dr. SHASHIDHAR E P, Dr. MAHESH F BALIKAI |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Objective:To evaluate the aesthetic perception of digitally simulated smile variations across five parameters; gingival display, midline diastema, midline deviation, crown angulation, and anterior tooth alignment, comparing the preferences and sensitivity of laypersons, orthodontists, and general dentists. Materials and Methods: Standardized smile photographs were digitally altered to produce three variations (ideal, mild, moderate) for each parameter. The images were presented to orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons, who rated esthetics using a 5-point Likert scale and selected the most esthetic option. Statistical analysis was performed to assess intergroup differences in esthetic ratings. Results: Orthodontists demonstrated the highest sensitivity to smile discrepancies, particularly gingival display and midline diastema, rating deviations less esthetic. General dentists showed moderate sensitivity, while laypersons were more tolerant of minor midline shifts and crown angulation changes. Anterior tooth alignment exerted the strongest influence on esthetic ratings, with severe crowding consistently perceived as least attractive. Conclusion: Perceptions of smile esthetics differ significantly among professional and lay observers. While professionals favour smiles closer to ideal standards, laypersons exhibit broader acceptance of mild discrepancies. Recognition of these differences is essential for aligning clinical objectives with patient expectations in contemporary orthodontic and esthetic treatment planning. |
| Keywords | Smile Esthetics, Digital dentistry, Orthodontics, Esthetic Perception |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-09-05 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.55349 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals