International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
The Berne Convention And The Rise Of Non-Human Creativity
| Author(s) | Ms. Sharwani Pandey, Dr. Pramod Kumar |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The exponential growth of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has shaken the principles of international copyright laws that are still mostly human-centric, with a particular focus on copyright as defined by the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886). Although the Convention recognizes originality, authorship, and the moral rights of the creator as the main features of human creativity, current AI technologies like DALL•E, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion can come up with the outputs that are not only similar in the visual aspect but also in the concept to the traditional works of authorship. This article deeply examines the structural differences between the Berne Convention and non-human creativity, pointing out the issues of legal personhood, originality, and moral rights as the most challenging ones. The paper also considers the comparative legal developments across various countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and India, that are the most revealing of the tension between the theoretical line of human authorship and algorithmic creativity as a matter of practice. The author of the paper reviews three possible alternatives that could fill those gaps, namely; the reinterpretation of authorship to account for human-AI collaboration, a multi-level rights system that matches protection with human contribution, and the setting up of a WIPO-led protocol for the international coordination of different approaches. The study that traces non-human creativity back to the Berne Convention's historical and normative framework rather concludes that copyright law needs to change so that it is still faithful to its original pledge to human creativity yet gives the necessary legal security in the era of algorithmic authorship. |
| Keywords | Berne Convention, generative AI, copyright law, authorship, originality, moral rights, legal personhood, WIPO, human-AI collaboration |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-09-11 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.55467 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals