International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Title: Facial Recognition and the Fourth Amendment: Search, Seizure, and Constitutional Limits in the Age of Algorithmic Surveillance
| Author(s) | Mr. Arjit Kandalai |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | This paper will discuss issues related to the constitutionality of the implementation of mass facial recognition technology (FRT) by U.S. law enforcement by 2025. It argues that FRT systems operating as one-to-many, that is, those systems that scan whole populations, are the contemporary general warrants in the Fourteenth Amendment, which the Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. According to a doctrinal study of Supreme Court jurisprudence, Katz, Carpenter, Jones, Kyllo, the case law, when applied, roughly analogizes to narrow the use of FRT, there is not, as of today, a legal regime that can effectively narrow a technology that allows passive, ubiquitous, and algorithmic tracking and surveillance. The examples of false arrests and actual instances where the FRTs have been used by the federal government prove to be immensely invasive, and the fact that the technology is biased racially is alarming. The paper finds that the present legislation in the United States is unsatisfactory and a federal mandate that warrants be issued on the basis of probable cause and then prescribed in an orderly of increasing protection safeguards of data minimization, autonomous control and disclosure, is a first step to avoid creation of a domed surveillance state that is inconsistent with constitutional practices. |
| Keywords | surveillance, constitutional norms, jurisprudence, law |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-10-03 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56376 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals