International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
A Historical, Comparative, and Policy Analysis of Simultaneous Elections
| Author(s) | Mr. Abdur Rehman |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This paper examines the “One Nation, One Election” proposal through historical context, global comparisons, and policy analysis. It traces the practice of simultaneous elections in India from 1951 to 1967 and explains how political instability, premature dissolutions, and the misuse of Article 356 disrupted the cycle. Since then, frequent elections have imposed heavy financial costs, created governance disruptions through repeated enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct, and increased dependence on corporate funding, thereby raising concerns about corruption and crony capitalism. Proponents argue that synchronized elections could curb these challenges, enhance efficiency, and provide greater policy continuity. Critics, however, caution that such reforms may dilute federalism, overshadow state-specific issues, marginalize regional parties, and pose significant logistical hurdles. Drawing on comparative experiences from the United States and the United Kingdom, the paper situates India’s debate within broader questions of electoral design and democratic accountability. It further analyzes institutional interventions, including the Law Commission, NITI Aayog, and the 2024 Kovind Committee report, which recommended phased implementation, a uniform electoral roll, and constitutional changes such as Articles 82A, 324A, and 356A, culminating in the 129th Constitutional Amendment Bill. The study concludes that while the reform is normatively attractive, its feasibility rests on political consensus, phased execution, and safeguards to preserve India’s pluralistic and federal ethos. |
| Keywords | One Nation One Election; Simultaneous Elections; Electoral Reforms; Federalism; Governance; Constitutional Amendments; Democratic Accountability; Comparative Politics |
| Field | Sociology > Politics |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-09-28 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56426 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals