Trial In Absentia:  A Shift Towards Efficiency Or A Threat To Fair Trial Rights?

Haricharan Vijay Anand; Vaishali T; Harini Balamurugan; Sujitha Vijay Anand

doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56499

Trial In Absentia: A Shift Towards Efficiency Or A Threat To Fair Trial Rights?

Author(s)	Mr. Haricharan Vijay Anand, Ms. Vaishali T, Ms. Harini Balamurugan, Ms. Sujitha Vijay Anand
Country	India
Abstract	The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) introduces for the first time a statutory framework for trial in absentia through Section 356, permitting courts to proceed against proclaimed offenders who deliberately evade trial. This provision reflects the legislature’s attempt to address India’s chronic problem of judicial delays, mounting pendency, and the misuse of procedural safeguards by absconding accused. It also signifies a broader victim-centric shift in criminal justice by recognising the right of victims to timely resolution. However, the innovation raises fundamental concerns regarding the constitutional guarantee of a fair trial under Article 21, which includes the right of the accused to be present, confront witnesses, and participate in their defence. International human rights standards under the ICCPR and the European Convention on Human Rights likewise emphasise presence at trial as a core safeguard. While comparative jurisdictions such as France and Italy have permitted absentee trials with strong safeguards like retrial rights, the Indian model risks criticism for lacking explicit corrective mechanisms. This paper analyses the historical development of trial in absentia, its limited recognition under the CrPC, and its codification under BNSS 2023. It evaluates the objectives of efficiency and victim protection against constitutional scrutiny and international obligations. Drawing on global perspectives, the study argues that Section 356 can be justified only if implemented with safeguards such as compulsory legal representation, robust notice procedures, retrial rights, and judicial oversight. The paper concludes that trial in absentia must balance efficiency with fairness to strengthen justice delivery without undermining due process.
Keywords	Trial in Absentia, BNSS 2023, Fair Trial Rights, Article 21, Judicial Efficiency, Victim Rights, Comparative Criminal Law, ICCPR, ECHR, Criminal Justice Reform.
Published In	Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2025
Published On	2025-09-23
DOI	https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56499

View / Download PDF File

E-ISSN 2582-2160

doi

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads

Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 2 Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 1 Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 6

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA

About IJFMR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9687-828-838	editor@ijfmr.com

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Trial In Absentia: A Shift Towards Efficiency Or A Threat To Fair Trial Rights?

Share this