International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Taxation of Influencer Marketing: A Grey Zone in Indian Tax Policy
| Author(s) | Ms. Anuja Verma |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The emergence of influencer marketing has reshaped India’s advertising landscape, creating new opportunities for digital entrepreneurship while raising complex legal and fiscal challenges. With the growth of social media platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, and short-video applications, influencers increasingly derive income through cash payments, barter arrangements, and non-monetary benefits such as freebies and sponsorships. Although provisions under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework theoretically capture these transactions, significant ambiguity persists in classifying income, valuing barter arrangements, and distinguishing gifts from taxable consideration. Recent measures, such as the introduction of Section 194R mandating tax deduction at source on perquisites, reflect policy efforts to bring influencer income within the tax net. However, compliance remains burdensome for small creators, and risks of double taxation undermine the efficiency of the current framework. A comparative analysis of international approaches in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Singapore reveals a trend towards explicit administrative guidance that clearly defines influencer taxation rules, especially regarding barter and non-monetary compensation. In contrast, India’s reliance on broad statutory provisions without detailed guidance sustains uncertainty and creates disputes. This paper argues that a balanced approach—through clear CBDT circulars, harmonisation of GST and income tax treatment, simplified regimes for micro- influencers, and platform-level reporting mechanisms—is necessary to ensure fairness, transparency, and administrative feasibility. By aligning tax policy with the realities of the digital economy, India can effectively regulate the influencer ecosystem without stifling its growth potential. |
| Keywords | Influencer Marketing; Income Tax Act, 1961; Section 28(iv); Section 194R; Goods and Services Tax (GST); Barter Transactions; Freebies; Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI); Digital Economy; Tax Policy in India |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-10-04 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.57200 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals