International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Lokpal - An Ombudsman or Political Tool: A Comparative study of India, Sweden and the UK.
| Author(s) | Mr. Varun Gowda |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This study examines India's Lokpal's institutional effectiveness, determining if it is a true anti-corruption ombudsman or a tool subject to political constraints. By comparing the Lokpal's operational reality with its legislative mission, a legal and functional study with the more established ombudsman institutions in Sweden and the UK is intended to critically evaluate the difference between the two. The material that is now available shows that India's five-decade battle to create the Lokpal has consistently lacked political will, which stands in stark contrast to the Swedish Ombudsman's organic constitutional development and the UK counterpart's practical legislative origins. In order to analyse primary sources like legislation, constitutional texts, and court rulings, as well as secondary sources like legislative reports, scholarly journals, and performance statistics, this study uses a qualitative, comparative technique. The findings show that the structural independence of the Indian Lokpal is undermined by its institutional design, namely its selection procedure and reliance on government-run investigative organizations. In practice, the Lokpal has remained mainly inactive, even though it seems to have significant prosecution powers. This operational immobility points to a purposeful political strategy of institutional incapacitation. The Swedish and UK models, on the other hand, which rely on "soft power," are more successful since they are really independent and neglecting their conclusions would have a significant political cost. According to the paper's findings, India's Lokpal is a fundamentally defective and ineffective agency that functions more as a political instrument for symbolic governance than as a strong, independent ombudsman. |
| Keywords | Lokpal, Ombudsman, Political Tool, Anti-corruption, Institutional Autonomy, Sweden Comparison, United Kingdom Ombudsman |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-10-27 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.58519 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals