International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Short-term Financing Strategies Adopted By Tata Steel vs SAIL Implication On Liquidity
| Author(s) | Dhruva Chandra |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The short-term financing methods that Tata Steel Limited and the Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) have chosen to implement are investigated in this paper, along with the consequences such policies have for the management of liquidity. Both of these businesses are active in the very capital-intensive steel industry in India, which is a sector in which effective management of working capital and liquidity is essential for ensuring continued operational stability and competitiveness. The research is centered on examining short-term sources of financing, such as trade credit, commercial paper, short-term loans, and bank overdrafts, as well as the influence that these sources have on key liquidity indicators, such as the current ratio, the quick ratio, and the cash conversion cycle. According to the findings, Tata Steel employs a strategy for short-term financing that is more market-driven and varied. In order to keep its liquidity in a healthy state, the company makes use of commercial papers and manages its receivables in an effective manner. SAIL, on the other hand, is more dependent on bank borrowings and trade payables, which is indicative of a conservative financing structure that can sometimes limit the flexibility of liquidity. Tata Steel has superior liquidity resilience and quicker cash flow turnover due to better alignment between financing choices and operational cycles, as shown by the comparison research. This is despite the fact that both companies retain acceptable short-term solvency. According to the findings of the study, the implementation of proactive short-term financing solutions, which include dynamic cash flow forecasting and a balanced mix of internal and external funding sources, considerably improves the management of liquidity in companies that rely heavily on capital. The policymakers, financial managers, and investors who are interested in evaluating the liquidity sustainability of the Indian steel business will find these findings extremely useful. |
| Keywords | Short-term financing, liquidity management, Tata Steel, SAIL, working capital, financial performance, steel industry. |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-11-09 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.59972 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals