International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
“From Barrel to Bench: A Critical Study of Bullet Trajectory Analysis in Crime Scene Reconstruction and Judicial Decision-Making in India,”
| Author(s) | Ragavi M |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Forensic ballistics is a critical tool in criminal investigations, providing scientific methods to reconstruct firearm-related crime scenes. Bullet trajectory analysis, a key sub-discipline, allows investigators to determine the shooter’s position, angle and distance of firing, and the nature of the shooting distinguishing homicide, suicide, or accidental discharge. Despite its scientific reliability, Indian courts have shown variable acceptance of trajectory evidence, often treating it as corroborative rather than conclusive, and at times prioritizing eyewitness or medical testimony. This study, titled “From Barrel to Bench: A Critical Study of Bullet Trajectory Analysis in Crime Scene Reconstruction and Judicial Decision-Making in India,” examines the reliability, admissibility, and judicial interpretation of trajectory analysis. Using a doctrinal approach, the research analyzes high-profile cases such as State of Madhya Pradesh. v. Paltan Mallah, (2005), Ram Narain Singh v. State of Punjab, Sohrabuddin Sheikh Encounter Case (2018), and Sukhwant Singh v. State of Punjab (1995)to explore how courts weigh ballistic evidence in criminal adjudication. The findings indicate that trajectory analysis is scientifically robust and invaluable for reconstructing crime scenes; however, its judicial impact is moderated by conflicting expert opinions, lack of standardized protocols, and the advisory status of expert testimony under Section 39 of Bharathiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. High-profile cases demonstrate its potential when corroborated with other evidence. The study concludes with recommendations for standardized forensic procedures, judicial training in ballistics, digital trajectory modeling, and better collaboration between medical and ballistic experts, to enhance the evidentiary weight of bullet trajectory analysis in India. |
| Keywords | Forensic Ballistics, Bullet Trajectory, Crime Scene Reconstruction, Judicial Decision-Making, High-Profile Cases, India |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-11-18 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60947 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals