International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Legal Ambiguities in Addressing Ghost Trademarks: A Comparative Analysis on Indian Trademark Law and International Jurisdictions
| Author(s) | Ms. Layasri B, Ms. Cruz Joshna I |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | A growing obstacle in the field of Intellectual Property Rights is Ghost trademarks referred to the trademarks that are not actively used in commerce. It provides a subtle difficulty in intellectual property law particularly in balancing the objectives of trademark protection with the need to prevent market distortion. In India as per the Trademarks Act 1999, a trademark should be used authentically and consistently; if not, it can be removed upon evidence of non-use. However, ghost trademarks continue to exist due to defensive registrations, procedural backlogs, and enforcement constraints. This research undertakes a comparative analysis on various jurisdictions including the United States, the European Union, and China. Each jurisdiction has distinct mechanisms in addressing ghost trademarks. The US depends on stringent use in commerce and periodic declarations of use; the EU emphasizes proof of use within five years after registration, unless genuine reasons for non-use are provided; China implements non-use cancellation actions to stop trademark hoarding. It is revealed by the comparative lens that though India’s legal provisions are conceptually in line with international standards, there are procedural inefficiencies that dilute their effectiveness. From a critical perspective, ghost trademarks in India compromise the integrity of the trademark registry, allowing speculative hoarding and making it more difficult for genuine businesses to enter the market. To resolve this issue, evidentiary requirements for renewal should be strengthened, cancellation proceedings should be accelerated, and transparency in the registry must be promoted. The study concludes that though India’s legal framework appears to be strong in theory, its practical enforcement requires modifications to conform with best practices globally to ensure fair competition and promote brand authenticity. |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-11-19 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60984 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals