International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Efficacy of High-intensity Laser Therapy with Myofascial Release Versus Ultrasound Therapy with Myofascial Release in Chronic Heel Pain in Amateur Badminton Players: a Comparative Study
| Author(s) | Dr. Kartik Sukhwal, Dr. Manisha Saharan, Dr. Shailendra Mehta |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Badminton players perform repeated sprinting, jumping, lunging and sudden directional changes that place high tensile and compressive loads on the plantar fascia and heel. These sport-specific loads increase risk of chronic heel pain (including plantar fasciitis) and can reduce training availability and performance. Chronic heel pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition that significantly limits functional mobility and quality of life. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has recently gained attention for its analgesic and tissue-healing effects. Ultrasound therapy (UST) remains a commonly used modality. Myofascial release (MFR) is frequently combined with electrotherapeutic modalities for enhanced outcomes. AIMS & OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of HILT + MFR versus UST + MFR on pain reduction, and functional improvement in individuals with chronic heel pain in amateur Badminton players. METHODOLOGY: A total of 60 amateur Badminton players aged 18-30 years with clinically diagnosed chronic heel pain (>6 months) were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (HILT + MFR) and Group B (UST + MFR). Treatment was administered 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks followed by 6-week follow-up session. Outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Revised Foot Function Index (FFI-RS), and Goniometer for ankle ROM measured at baseline, mid and post-treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and unpaired t-tests with significance set at α = 0.05 (two-tailed). RESULT: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in VAS, FFI, and ankle ROM (p < 0.01). However, Group A showed greater reduction in pain and ankle ROM compared to Group B (p < 0.01). Functional improvement (FFI) was also superior in Group A. CONCLUSION: These findings support HILT+MFR as a preferred evidence-based conservative treatment approach for chronic heel pain in athletic populations. High-Intensity Laser Therapy combined with Myofascial Release is more effective than Ultrasound Therapy with Myofascial Release for improving pain, and function in chronic heel pain in Badminton Players. Thus, HILT+MFR should be considered a preferred physical therapy approach for this population. |
| Keywords | KEYWORDS: Chronic heel pain, plantar fasciitis, high-intensity laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, myofascial release, physiotherapy, pain management. |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-12-14 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.63447 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals