International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 2 (March-April 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of April to publish your research paper in the issue of March-April.

Efficacy of High-intensity Laser Therapy with Myofascial Release Versus Ultrasound Therapy with Myofascial Release in Chronic Heel Pain in Amateur Badminton Players: a Comparative Study

Author(s) Dr. Kartik Sukhwal, Dr. Manisha Saharan, Dr. Shailendra Mehta
Country India
Abstract ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Badminton players perform repeated sprinting, jumping, lunging and sudden directional changes that place high tensile and compressive loads on the plantar fascia and heel. These sport-specific loads increase risk of chronic heel pain (including plantar fasciitis) and can reduce training availability and performance. Chronic heel pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition that significantly limits functional mobility and quality of life. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has recently gained attention for its analgesic and tissue-healing effects. Ultrasound therapy (UST) remains a commonly used modality. Myofascial release (MFR) is frequently combined with electrotherapeutic modalities for enhanced outcomes.

AIMS & OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of HILT + MFR versus UST + MFR on pain reduction, and functional improvement in individuals with chronic heel pain in amateur Badminton players.

METHODOLOGY: A total of 60 amateur Badminton players aged 18-30 years with clinically diagnosed chronic heel pain (>6 months) were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (HILT + MFR) and Group B (UST + MFR). Treatment was administered 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks followed by 6-week follow-up session. Outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Revised Foot Function Index (FFI-RS), and Goniometer for ankle ROM measured at baseline, mid and post-treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and unpaired t-tests with significance set at α = 0.05 (two-tailed).

RESULT: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in VAS, FFI, and ankle ROM (p < 0.01). However, Group A showed greater reduction in pain and ankle ROM compared to Group B (p < 0.01). Functional improvement (FFI) was also superior in Group A.

CONCLUSION: These findings support HILT+MFR as a preferred evidence-based conservative treatment approach for chronic heel pain in athletic populations. High-Intensity Laser Therapy combined with Myofascial Release is more effective than Ultrasound Therapy with Myofascial Release for improving pain, and function in chronic heel pain in Badminton Players. Thus, HILT+MFR should be considered a preferred physical therapy approach for this population.
Keywords KEYWORDS: Chronic heel pain, plantar fasciitis, high-intensity laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, myofascial release, physiotherapy, pain management.
Field Medical / Pharmacy
Published In Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025
Published On 2025-12-14
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.63447

Share this