International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Comparative Analysis of Click and Level-Specific CE Chirp Stimuli in Auditory Brainstem Response Testing in Children
| Author(s) | Mr. Mayank Mehra, Mr. Omprakash Preyadarshi, Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Mr. Pawan Kumar |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Background: Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) testing is a widely used objective method for evaluating auditory pathway integrity, especially in populations where behavioural audiometry is unreliable. Traditional click stimuli, while broadly used, are limited in synchronizing cochlear responses due to travel time dispersion along the basilar membrane. Level specific CE chirp stimuli were developed to counteract these delays and improve neural synchrony. The present study aimed to establish normative CE chirp ABR data in children aged 6–12 years and compare latency and threshold outcomes with click evoked responses. Methods: Thirty children with normal hearing (6–12 years) underwent ABR testing with both click and level specific CE chirp stimuli. Latencies of waves I, III, and V were recorded at 75 dBnHL. Standard audiological evaluations (PTA, immittance, DPOAEs) ensured normal peripheral hearing. Statistical comparisons were made using paired t tests (SPSS v20). Results: CE chirp stimuli yielded significantly shorter latencies for waves III and V compared to click stimuli in both ears, whereas wave I latency differences were not significant. Estimated hearing thresholds were significantly lower with CE chirp stimuli. The differential wave V latency at threshold further suggested improved neural synchrony with CE chirp compared to click stimulation. Conclusions: Level specific CE chirp stimuli produce more synchronized neural responses, leading to earlier wave III and V latencies and better threshold estimation than click stimuli. Their clinical use is recommended for pediatric ABR protocols to enhance test efficiency and reliability. |
| Keywords | Auditory Brainstem Response ,CE chirp stimuli ,click evoked responses, latencies, pediatric |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-12-14 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.63587 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals