International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Impact of postmortem decomposition and secondary trauma on the preservation of tool marks in bone and cartilage
| Author(s) | Ms. Medha K N, Mr. Sugith Kumar |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Marks left by tools on bone and cartilage provide essential forensic evidence in cases of homicide, revealing details about the weapons involved and the sequence of the assault. However, changes occurring after death, including natural decay and additional damage from factors such as heat exposure, water submersion, animal activity, autopsy procedures, and improper handling, often alter these marks by blurring fine scratches, changing cut widths, and creating misleading patterns that reduce their reliability for analysis and court decisions. This legal review identifies a significant gap in current scholarship: while forensic studies explain the formation of such marks in detail, few analyses connect patterns of post-death alteration to legal standards for evidence acceptance, particularly in light of India's recent criminal laws such as the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Relying solely on statutes, landmark cases including State of Maharashtra v. Suresh (2001) and Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010), established guidelines from NIJ and OSAC, and micro-CT imaging mechanism, this study-based examination avoids original data collection. Results show the Indian courts' heavy dependence on expert opinions without specific measures for degraded evidence, in contrast to reliability requirements under Daubert in global jurisprudence. Recommendations include required initial 3D imaging, clear protocols for identifying false marks, adapted reliability tests, training for judges in bone forensics, and updates to BNSS for decay assessments. These steps would improve evidence strength, prevent errors in interpretation, lower risks of unjust verdicts, and bring Indian practices in line with international norms, securing the value of bone evidence in criminal trials. |
| Keywords | Tool marks, taphonomy, postmortem decomposition, forensic anthropology, evidentiary admissibility |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-12-28 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.64319 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals