International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Administrative and Policy Level Comparison : Pune versus Dubai
| Author(s) | Mr Vikas Navanath Dhakane, Dr Siddharth Jabade |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | How do cities determine how to manage themselves? This question may seem rather straightforward, yet analysis of its answer is highly revealing about underlying attitudes toward citizen engagement versus administrative efficiency. Urban governance systems evolve from political culture, historical institution-building, and societal value considerations cultivated through a social environment. This discussion will address such considerations through a review of two cities with very different systems of managing themselves: Pune, a democratic, metropolitan city in the state of Maharashtra, India, and Dubai, a centralized, emirate-level city within the United Arab Emirates. Through a consideration of how each respects city governance structure, decision-making process, role of implementation, citizen engagement, and current-day administrative considerations, a discussion of how such different systems might be implemented by each city will be attempted. While each of the cities, Pune and Dubai, seeks to modernize and offer necessary services for their citizens, it is apparent that one follows a set of administration fundamentals that are opposite another. While Pune follows a system respecting deliberative decision-making, electoral representation, and a separation of governing authority, Dubai respects a system with emphasis on speedy administration, central coordination, and a common goal-strategy. For either system, one might properly question a superiority principle. Rather, it is a function of a proper set of administration fundamentals to decide how a system places value upon decision-making and implementation versus citizen engagement and accountabilities. Through a look at Pune and Dubai, much about questions underlying a system for governing cities in the modern, second-first century might become apparent. |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-12-23 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.64427 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals