International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
SJC-2026
Conferences Published ↓
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
ICMESS-24
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
ICCAIoT23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 1
January-February 2026
Indexing Partners
Demands of Ulfa in the Light of International Law
| Author(s) | Lawyer Dr Chitta Ranjan Boruah |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | ABSTRACT: The United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA), established in 1979, emerged as a militant political organization in Assam under the leadership of Paresh Barua, articulating demands rooted in political sovereignty, cultural identity, economic justice, and indigenous self-respect. This research paper critically examines the principal demands of ULFA within the framework of international law, with particular reference to the doctrines of self-determination, state sovereignty, territorial integrity, human rights, and indigenous rights. The study evaluates whether ULFA’s claims find support under contemporary international legal norms or whether they conflict with established principles governing sovereign states. Adopting a doctrinal and analytical methodology, the paper argues that while several grievances raised by ULFA—especially those concerning cultural protection, economic marginalization, and human rights—resonate with international human rights discourse, the demand for unilateral secession lacks legal legitimacy under prevailing international law. The paper further explores the theoretical discourse on secessionist movements and terrorism, assessing whether ULFA’s activities may be categorised as terrorism under international legal definitions. The study concludes that sustainable resolution lies not in armed struggle but in constitutional, democratic, and internationally lawful mechanisms of internal self-determination. This research contributes to academic debate on insurgent movements, indigenous rights, and lawful alternatives to secession within democratic states. |
| Keywords | KEYWORDS: ULFA, International Law, Self-Determination, Sovereignty, Human Rights, Indigenous Rights, Assam |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-01-04 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.65654 |
| Short DOI | https://doi.org/hbhsh6 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.