International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 1 (January-February 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of February to publish your research paper in the issue of January-February.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 1
January-February 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Morality and Reasoning: An Analysis of Judicial Going Beyond the Delegation

Author(s) Mr. Kishore Chandra Jena
Country India
Abstract This article discusses the historic relationship between ‘morality and reasoning’. It is specifically more about judicial reasoning. At the beginning, this article defines ‘morality’ and ‘reasoning’. It shows how and why reasoning ought not to be dictated in terms of religious morality. A state or the states having their own diversities must have to get rid of religious fundamentalism so far as making the law and its working goes on. It is so as to insure and ensure that constitutionalism does not fall prey to the servitude dominated and imposed by precedents, racial and religious traditions, customs and it is so as to let reasoning evolve independent of any kind of envelopment. This article, for that purpose, studies how a former Chief justice of the Supreme Court reflects on his papal belief being a dominant force in writing his judgement in one of the historic litigations which consequently did not give secularism its due share. Religious considerations in the interpretations of secular laws have caused irreparable damage to the very constitutional fabrics of the nation-states. Shah Bano judgement is an example. The judgements on the de-activation or abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India invites questions in regard to independence of judiciary. Studies show that on certain occasions, the judicial system going beyond the fixed as well as the implied delegation is not free from the politics of the day.

Practices at large in the international communities, even though immoral, have vehemently coined the word ‘amoral’ which is neither moral nor immoral. When something done is illegal, it is said to be legitimate. So, amoral reasoning in the international political economy is considered as legitimate and the national judiciaries are shaped and educated accordingly.
Field Arts
Published In Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026
Published On 2026-01-07
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.65950
Short DOI https://doi.org/hbjmh7
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 6Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 5Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 4

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com