International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Liberty: That Plus More, My Lord!
| Author(s) | Mr. Kishore Chandra Jena |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This article is all about free expression and individual’s liberty on the one hand, and on the other, in contrary with preventive detention. The nomenclature of this article is derived from the reply submitted by M. K. Nambiar representing A.K. Gopalan to the question from Justice S.R. Das in the Supreme Court of India. This article spins and hinges on and around the judgement in the matter of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, Union of India. Freedom as well liberty has been defined and the little differentiation between the two terms has been studied. The evolution of liberty since the days of Magna Charta/Magna Carta has been looked into. The similarity as well as difference between ‘procedure established by law’ and ‘due process of law’ is brought up for discussion. Various amendments to the Constitution of the US have been hinted at for better understanding. The history of preventive detentions has been collected from the judicial and legal experiences in the United Kingdom and from India, too. This article ventures into the horizon of politics of judiciary. How individuals have languished in jails and suffered for long from incarceration for no crime they have committed. They are dumped into incarceration simply because the State feels that their future acts or actions are anticipated to the State’s hegemony. Some authors are of the opinion that sometimes judges behave as more executive than the executive. The article investigates the aspect of an independent judiciary. The discussions and debates on the floor of the Constituent Assembly of India have been referred to in regard to Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitutions of India. An attempt has been made to trace out the presence of class bias in judiciary. Let us hope that this write up would help scholars and researchers in discovering unfound horizons of constitutionalism. |
| Keywords | Freedom, liberty, preventive detention, reasonable restriction, Magna carta, the politics of the judiciary |
| Field | Arts |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-01-19 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.66877 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals