International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Practice of Dowry in India and Criminal Justice System Critical Analysis
| Author(s) | Ms. Sidhi Tiwari |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The dowry system remains one of India’s most entrenched socio-cultural problems, continuing unabated despite the prohibitions introduced by the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, its subsequent amendments, and sustained public awareness initiatives. What originated historically as stridhana—a voluntary bestowal of gifts to women—gradually evolved into a compulsory and transactional transfer of wealth, shaped by patriarchal kinship structures, caste-based hierarchies, and economic conditions reinforced during the colonial period. Contemporary research indicates that the persistence of dowry practices is closely tied to structural socio-economic factors, including the marriage squeeze, processes of Sanskritization, widening income inequalities, commodification of grooms, and weak implementation of legal provisions. Although the Indian legal framework has expanded over time—through provisions such as Sections 304-B and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, Section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act, and the Dowry Prohibition Rules, 1985—conviction rates remain low. This is largely due to delayed reporting, coercion of victims, evidentiary challenges, and the pervasive social acceptance of dowry. International human rights instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1979), and the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women (1993), recognize dowry-related abuse as a violation of human dignity, equality, bodily autonomy, and fundamental rights. Similarly, the Beijing Platform for Action (1995) and the Sustainable Development Goals call upon states to eliminate harmful cultural practices such as dowry. Thus, despite legislative progress, the continuing prevalence of dowry reflects a complex interplay of cultural norms, gender-based power inequalities, and socio-economic pressures. Meaningful eradication of the practice requires not only stronger enforcement mechanisms but also gender-equitable inheritance systems, the economic empowerment of women, and deeper transformative social change |
| Keywords | Dowry system, Stridhana, Gender-based violence, Dowry Prohibition Act 1961, Marriage market, Sanskritization, Marriage squeeze, Patriarchal norms, Caste hierarchy, Dowry deaths, Human rights, CEDAW, UDHR, Beijing Declaration, Women’s empowerment. |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-01-22 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.67074 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals