International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
A Comparative Analysis of Spatial And Frequency Domain Smoothing Techniques For Digital Image Noise Reduction
| Author(s) | Mr. Japheth Kodua Wiredu, Reuben Acheampong Wiredu, Valentine Aveyom, Stephen Akobre |
|---|---|
| Country | Ghana |
| Abstract | In image acquisition and transmission, noise often hinders the integrity of digital images which are vital in different medical diagnostic applications, surveillance and remote sensing. This paper provides a comparative analysis of classical smoothing methods within the spatial and frequency domains with respect to digital image denoising. Spatial filters: Mean, Median, Gaussian, and Interquartile Range (IQR) as well as frequency-domain filters: IDEAL, Butterworth, and Gaussian Low-Pass filters were tested on prototypical test images corrupted with Gaussian (s=25) noise, salt-and-pepper (20% density) noise. The measures of performance used were: Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural similarity Index (SSIM), and Mean Squared Error (MSE), with the aid of qualitative visual examination. Findings show that there is a performance dichotomy. In salt-and-pepper noise, the nonlinear filters performed best in terms of PSNR (up to 32.1 dB) and SSIM (>0.85) were spatial, which removes impulsive noise by meeting edges. In the case of Gaussian noise, frequency-domain filters, most especially Butterworth Low-Pass filter (PSNR = 28.5 dB) offered smoothing that was superior, although with a loss of high-frequency detail, and (in the Ideal filter) with ringing artifacts. There were no single techniques that were observed to be optimal in all types of noise, and this highlights the significance of noise-sensitive filter choice. The work offers a validated parameter of selecting denoising algorithms in accordance with noise properties. The results are very compelling in the sense that adaptive or hybrid frameworks can be dynamically developed by integrating the strengths of the two domains. This analysis will be expanded in the future to color images, to which deep learning-based denoisers will be used as a reference, and context-aware filter selection intelligent systems will be explored. |
| Keywords | Image Denoising, Spatial-Domain Filters, Frequency-Domain Filters, Gaussian Noise, Salt-and-Pepper Noise, Structural Similarity Index, Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio |
| Field | Computer > Artificial Intelligence / Simulation / Virtual Reality |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-02-12 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.68123 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals