International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Imperial Silence and Domestic Order: Colonial Foundations in Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park
| Author(s) | Dr. sonia khajuria |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park (1814) occupies a distinctive position within the canon of nineteenth-century British fiction. Traditionally interpreted as a novel concerned with moral education, domestic stability, and social hierarchy, it has often been treated as detached from the political and economic realities of imperial expansion. However, postcolonial criticism has demonstrated that the domestic order represented in the novel is materially and ideologically linked to Britain’s colonial enterprise. Edward Said’s influential reading argues that the Bertram family’s wealth originates in a slave plantation in Antigua, yet Austen refrains from directly representing colonial labour or violence. This paper examines how Mansfield Park sustains imperial ideology through narrative omission, spatial displacement, and moral normalization. Drawing upon theoretical insights from Edward Said, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, and Homi K. Bhabha, the study argues that Austen’s domestic realism is structurally dependent upon imperial power. Colonial exploitation remains both essential and invisible, enabling the English estate to appear morally coherent and socially stable. By presenting imperial wealth as natural while excluding its human consequences, the novel contributes to the cultural processes through which empire was legitimized. Ultimately, Mansfield Park reveals that domestic order and imperial authority were not separate domains but mutually reinforcing structures within nineteenth-century British society. |
| Keywords | imperial ideology, colonial economy, narrative silence, domestic realism, postcolonial criticism, British empire, Austen, Mansfield Park |
| Field | Sociology > Linguistic / Literature |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-02-20 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.69384 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals