International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Relic Worship in Buddhism and Its influence on Design, Symbolism and Spatial Organization of Buddhist Architecture
| Author(s) | Mr. Varayogi Vamshi Dhar |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Relic worship existed at the center of the Buddhist tradition from the very beginning, immediately after the death of the Buddha around 483 BCE. The recovery of the holy relics of the Buddha, originally enshrined in eight stupas, and their division into 84,000 parts for enshrining them in stupas among various regions by Emperor Ashoka, marked the propagation of Buddhism and the cult practice of relic worship. Buddhism began to appear in the archaeological record around the 3rd century BCE, revealing structures such as stupas and chaityagrihas, recognized as fundamental Buddhist monuments, and later viharas (monasteries). The spatial organization of these sites is relic-centered: the stupa forms the core, chaityagrihas provide congregational spaces, and viharas function as peripheral residential complexes, supporting ritual practice, monastic discipline, and community engagement. This paper explores how relic worship influenced the form, decoration, and meaning of Buddhist monuments. Rather than viewing relics as merely lifeless objects of worship, this research suggests that they were primary drivers of monastic and architectural development. To examine this, four cases were selected: Sanchi, Amaravati, Ajanta, and Borobudur, each representing a different stage in the development and proliferation of Buddhist architecture. At Sanchi, ritual movement centered on the stupa, drawing devotees into circular rounds around the relic, circumambulating the stupa. Amaravati added refinement to the concept with elegant carvings, in which narrative and relic veneration blended into a single visual form. Ajanta brought the tradition indoors, integrating relic shrines into monastic routine, and Borobudur elevated it, where pilgrims climbed through levels representing stages of enlightenment. Through these examples, relics remained the religious focus of Buddhist architecture, their form evolving to suit local culture and artistic preferences. This study presents relic worship as an evolving, unifying force that intertwined devotion, symbolism, and space in ways still experienced today. |
| Keywords | Ajanta , Amaravati, Borobudur, Buddhist architecture , Relic Worship, Sanchi. |
| Field | Sociology > Archaeology / History |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-02-27 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.69909 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals