International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 2 (March-April 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of April to publish your research paper in the issue of March-April.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Judicial Activism in India: Constitutional Foundations and Expanding Dimensions of Judicial Power

Author(s) Dr. Rajeev Soni
Country India
Abstract In India, judicial activism is a prominent example of the judiciary taking an active role in enforcing constitutional rights and principles by actively participating in cases. Judicial activism has its origins in the constitutional structure, including Articles 32, 226, 136, and 142. Its purpose is to hold the executive and legislative departments to account. In situations where the state’s actions are deemed arbitrary, unreasonable, or in violation of basic rights, this article delves into the constitutional provisions that grant the power to the Supreme Court and High Courts to step in. A number of landmark court decisions have increased the reach of judicial review and fortified safeguards for civil liberties; they include Vishaka, Kesavananda Bharati, and Maneka Gandhi cases. Public Interest Litigation’s (PILs) evolution has greatly broadened the concept of locus standi, making justice more accessible to society’s most vulnerable and oppressed members. However, discussions about the possibility of judicial overreach and the intricate balance that exists within the separation of powers have been sparked by the increasing scope of judicial authority. Although judicial activism is crucial in constitutional administration, the study argues that it must be applied with moderation to maintain democratic principles’ equilibrium.
Keywords Judicial activism, Constitutional provisions, Public Interest Litigation, Separation of Power, Organs of Government.
Field Sociology > Administration / Law / Management
Published In Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026
Published On 2026-02-27
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 1Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 6

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals