International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
From Merit to Disclosure: The Political Economy of India's IPO Regulation
| Author(s) | Ms. Shilpi Sharma |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The shift from the Controller of Capital Issues' (CCI) merit-based capital issues regime to the Securities and Exchange Board of India's (SEBI) disclosure-oriented framework is commonly cited as a pivotal point in the liberalization of the market. The claim is revisited in this publication. It contends that merit regulation was not abolished by the post-1992 IPO environment, but rather moved into institutional, procedural, and informational forms. The paper shows that regulatory screening continues through delegated gatekeeping and eligibility filters by closely examining the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, the draft prospectus observation process, merchant banker due diligence requirements, and the legitimating role of qualified institutional buyers. The paper conceptualizes disclosure not as a neutral transparency tool but rather as a governance strategy that regulates access to capital and distributes informational power, placing India's framework within the literature of political economics and law. Furthermore, a comparison with the US and the UK demonstrates that India's preservation of anchor allocations, institutional certification requirements, and profitability thresholds results in a hybrid disclosure–merit regime that differs from the more straightforward disclosure models of developed markets. In terms of investor protection, intermediary accountability, and the governance of capital markets in emerging nations, the paper concludes that India's IPO regulation represents a shift in regulatory authority rather than a retreat. |
| Keywords | IPO Regulation, Political Economy of Securities Law, gatekeeper liability, Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs), Emerging Markets |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 1, January-February 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-02-28 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.70193 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals