International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Substitution of Chinese LD Polythene with Compostable Packaging (Eco-friendly Packaging)
| Author(s) | Mr. Satyam Garg |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Leaning so heavily on imported low-density polyethene, often just called "Chinese LD" in the trade, does stir up real sustainability headaches. I mean, picture those massive shipments crossing oceans, piling on carbon footprints before the plastic even hits your factory floor. Our look here probes if certified compostable packaging can step up to LDPE's plate, matching its toughness while maybe easing some environmental guilt and, over time, trimming costs too. We dug into the nitty-gritty comparisons from fresh lab runs: mechanical stuff like tensile strength and puncture resistance, plus barrier performance against oxygen, CO2, and moisture. LDPE films versus those PLA/PBAT blends that everyone's buzzing about in the compostable space. Numbers suggest the blends hold their own pretty well, at least for many shelf-stable goods, though admittedly, they might falter under extreme humidity or heavy flexing, a point worth flagging for anyone in high-abuse packaging. Life cycle costs paint an interesting picture as well. Sure, compostables carry a steeper upfront price tag per kilo, and processing them might guzzle a bit more energy on some machines. Yet industry cases like that snack maker in Europe who swapped over, hint at offsets: lower disposal fees in regions charging for landfill plastic, plus credits from carbon accounting schemes. Add in consumer surveys, where a solid 30% or so say they'd pony up extra for that compostable badge, and the math starts tilting toward viability. Not a slam dunk everywhere, mind you; rural markets or cost-slashing buyers might baulk. So, practically speaking, businesses could follow a loose roadmap to test the waters. Start with an audit of your current setup check certifications, map out weak spots. Tweak the machinery next; most extruders need only minor die adjustments for PLA blends. Train the line workers, they're the ones spotting defects early. Finally, market the hell out of those green labels; turns a cost into a story, customers actually buy into. It's not without risks, like supply chain hiccups for bio-based resins, but for firms facing EU mandates or brand pressure, this path keeps products intact without breaking the bank. |
| Keywords | Compostable Packaging, Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE), PLA/PBAT Blends, Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA), Sustainable Supply Chain, Barrier Properties, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) |
| Field | Business Administration |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-03-15 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals