International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Religious Conversion, Constitutionalism, and Marginality in India: Historical Evolution, Legal Regulation, and State-Level Realities in Southern India
| Author(s) | Prof. Sanjoy Roy, Dr. Dr. Sanjeev Kumar |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Religious conversion around the world involved not only faith but also social identity, law, politics and various other regional attributes. Although conversion is often understood as a personal spiritual decision, in India it has also been a path toward dignity, social mobility, and resistance within a deeply hierarchical society. This paper explores conversion both as a constitutional freedom and as a lived reality shaped by structural inequality, with particular attention to developments in Southern India. The paper explores not only the history of different forms of conversion but also the sociological and political aspects of the same. A major thinker in this context has been Dr. B. R. Ambedkar who considered that conversion has rarely been only about theology; it has also been about equality and recognition. The second aspect of the paper highlights the constitutional and legal provisions of the same ranging from Articles 14, 21, and 25–28 of the Constitution, the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, and the Supreme Court’s ruling in Rev. Stainislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1977), the paper further highlights a constitutional tension i.e. individuals are free to change their religion, yet may lose affirmative action protections. It calls for a more balanced approach that protects both religious freedom and substantive equality. |
| Keywords | Religion, conversion, Ambedkar, Constitution, Marginality, Faith, Politics |
| Field | Sociology > Politics |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-03-09 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i02.70692 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals