Cyber Crime in the Digital Age: Legal Challenges, Regulatory Frameworks, and the Future of Cybersecurity Governance

Rajendra

Cyber Crime in the Digital Age: Legal Challenges, Regulatory Frameworks, and the Future of Cybersecurity Governance

Author(s)	Rajendra
Country	India
Abstract	Cybercrime in the digital age is best understood not as a single offence-type but as an evolving ecosystem of illicit conduct enabled by networked information and communications technologies, featuring highly scalable harm, low marginal cost of attack, and persistent cross-border jurisdictional friction. The record already shows that states and international bodies recognized three foundational policy imperatives: (i) criminalization calibrated to the confidentiality-integrity-availability (CIA) of data and systems; (ii) procedural powers capable of securing volatile electronic evidence; and (iii) international cooperation that operates at “network speed” while remaining constrained by due process and rights safeguards. These imperatives are embedded in early global instruments such as the 2000 UN General Assembly resolution on criminal misuse of information technologies and, most prominently, the 2001 Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention). This paper argues that cybercrime governance (as of 2013) exhibits a structural “trilemma”: (a) territorial criminal law and procedure remain state-based; (b) cybercrime evidence, victims, and infrastructure routinely span multiple territories; and (c) the technical architecture of the internet (including encryption, distributed hosting, and platform-mediated social interaction) compresses investigative time horizons and complicates attribution. The result is systematic pressure on legal categories, jurisdiction, admissibility, privacy constraints, and procedural legality, that were formed for physical evidence and territorially bounded misconduct. Comparatively, the governance landscape could be characterized as a layered model: domestic substantive offences and investigative powers at the base; regional harmonization and market-constitutional constraints (notably within the EU) in the middle; and treaty-based cooperation instruments at the top. In the EU, this layering is visible in the sequence from the 2005 Framework Decision on attacks against information systems through the 2013 Directive that replaced it, combined with parallel regimes on data protection and intermediary liability (e-commerce) that shape enforcement boundaries.
Keywords	Cyber Crime; Cybersecurity Governance; Digital Evidence; Cross-Border Jurisdiction; Budapest Convention.
Published In	Volume 4, Issue 2, March-April 2022
Published On	2022-03-10

View / Download PDF File

About IJFMR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9687-828-838	editor@ijfmr.com

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Cyber Crime in the Digital Age: Legal Challenges, Regulatory Frameworks, and the Future of Cybersecurity Governance

Share this