International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 3 (May-June 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of June to publish your research paper in the issue of May-June.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Minority Shareholder Protection in India: Oppression and Mismanagement under Section 241-242, Companies Act 2013

Author(s) Rajendra
Country India
Abstract Minority shareholder protection is a basic element of the contemporary corporate governance, which guarantees that the rights of majority shareholders and the controlling management are exercised in the frames of fairness and legality. The Companies Act, 2013 provided a unified statutory basis to deal with grievances of shareholders by the remedies of oppression and mismanagement under the section of 241-242. Through these provisions, members of a company are allowed to petition the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in which the affairs of the company are managed in a way that is oppressive, prejudicial to minority shareholders, or harmful to the interests of the company or the public interest. This paper critically looks at the doctrinal basis, development of legislation and the practical working of these provisions within the Indian corporate governance regime.
This paper examines the legal framework that regulates minority protection, such as the jurisdiction of the NCLT, the eligibility requirements in the statute of minority protection, i.e. Section 244, the interim and final remedies under Section 242, and the evidentiary standards to prove the presence of oppression or mismanagement. It also assesses the major judicial precedents like Shanti Prasad Jain v. Kalinga Tubes Ltd., v. Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad. Shantadevi P. Gaekwad, and Venus Petrochemicals v. Niranjan Kumar Agarwal, which have influenced the meaning of oppressive behavior and defined the boundaries of tribunal intervention in corporate management. The paper places the Indian framework in the context of common-law traditions of shareholder protection by doctrinal analysis and comparison with the unfair prejudice remedy in section 994 of the UK Companies Act 2006 and the oppression remedy in section 232 of the Australian Corporations Act 2001.
The study also sheds light on procedural and structural issues in the effective implementation of minority rights such as large numerical requirements to petition, length of time to hear cases in tribunal, and ambiguity of the just and equitable standard within the context of section 242. The paper, based on reported cases, tribunal practice, and academic commentary to 2019, finds that there are new judicial trends that are increasingly demanding a pattern of oppressive conduct, as opposed to individual corporate decisions.
The paper concludes that although the provisions of the section 241-242 offer a broad and strong remedial tool, its use is limited by the barriers to the procedure and interpretive contradictions. It suggests specific reforms, including rationalization of the membership levels in the framework of the section 244, principles of valuation of buy-out remedies, and institutional capacity of the NCLT system. These reforms would improve the balance between managerial independence and minority rights, which would strengthen investor confidence and encourage fair corporate governance in India.
Keywords Minority Shareholder Protection; Oppression and Mismanagement; Companies Act 2013; Sections 241-242; Corporate Governance
Published In Volume 4, Issue 3, May-June 2022
Published On 2022-05-13
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 1Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 6

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals