International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
The Biology Behind the Scaffold: A Comparative Evaluation of Allografts and Alloplasts
| Author(s) | Dr. Anam Saiyed, Mr. Jagdish Buch |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Background: Alveolar bone resorption following tooth extraction and periodontal disease frequently compromises ideal implant placement. While autogenous bone remains the gold standard, limitations such as donor site morbidity and limited availability have driven the widespread adoption of allografts and synthetic alloplastic substitutes. Objective: To critically analyze the biologic behavior, regenerative mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and limitations of allografts and alloplastic bone substitutes in alveolar bone regeneration, with emphasis on qualitative bone formation and remodelling dynamics. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of published literature evaluating histologic integration, osteoinductive potential, implant survival rates, remodelling patterns, and complication profiles of human-derived and synthetic bone substitutes. Results: Both allografts and alloplasts demonstrate reliable osteoconductive properties and comparable implant survival rates. However, allografts exhibit additional osteoinductive potential and more physiologic remodelling in several histomorphometric analyses. Alloplastic materials offer structural stability and safety but may demonstrate slower turnover and residual particle persistence. Conclusion: While both categories are clinically effective, the biologic contribution and remodelling dynamics associated with allografts may provide advantages in regenerative scenarios requiring enhanced vital bone formation and integration. |
| Keywords | Keywords: Allograft; Alloplast; Alveolar bone regeneration; Guided bone regeneration; Hydroxyapatite; Beta-tricalcium phosphate; Biphasic calcium phosphate; Bioactive glass; Implant dentistry; Osteoinduction; Osteoconduction; Bone substitutes |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-03-19 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals