International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Eyes in the Sky, Rights on the Ground: Administrative Surveillance and Privacy
| Author(s) | Mr. Pawan Bindal, Dr. Ramveer Singh |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Abstract Administrative agencies' ability to keep an eye on ecological conditions and enforce compliance has changed as a result of the incorporation of satellite and aerial technologies into environmental regulation. These "eyes in the sky"—drones, high-resolution satellite imagery, and sophisticated remote sensing—provide previously unheard-of accuracy in identifying environmental infractions, charting changes in land use, and evaluating the exploitation of natural resources. Although these tools improve ecological governance, they also bring up moral and legal issues with regard to property rights, privacy, and administrative overreach. The relationship between environmental monitoring and individual rights protection is examined in this doctrine analysis. It looks at statutory frameworks, pertinent administrative law principles, and constitutional restrictions, especially those related to search and seizure jurisprudence that control the gathering and application of aerial data. It illustrates how courts have struggled to define reasonable expectations of privacy in the context of technologically enhanced observation by referencing comparative case law from several jurisdictions. The study also discusses proportionality as a guiding principle, balancing possible infringements on individual autonomy against the interests of the environment as a whole. In order to guarantee that surveillance serves justifiable environmental goals without undermining fundamental liberties, it highlights the necessity of procedural safeguards like transparency in data collection, restrictions on data retention, and independent oversight mechanisms. In the end, the analysis makes the case for a balanced legal strategy that takes into account both democratic principles and the advancement of technology. Administrative environmental surveillance can be used as a tool for sustainable governance that upholds rights on the ground while keeping watchful eyes in the sky by balancing ecological stewardship with privacy protections. |
| Keywords | Keywords: - Administrative Surveillance, Privacy Rights, Aerial and Satellite Monitoring, Proportionality Principle |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-03-27 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i02.72493 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals