International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 2 (March-April 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of April to publish your research paper in the issue of March-April.

The Places of Worship Act, 1991: A Constitutional Secular Safeguard or Bar on a Historical Justice?

Author(s) Yashraj Singh, Dr. Sheeba Khalid
Country India
Abstract This paper critically evaluates the constitutional validity and contemporary relevance of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 in the context of rising claims for the reclamation of places of worship in India. This debate has assumed renewed urgency in the wake of the Ayodhya verdict in M. Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs v. Mahant Suresh Das, as well as on-going disputes in respect of Kashi, Mathura, and Sambhal, amongst other places of worship in India. Essentially, the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 intends to preserve the religious nature of places of worship as it existed on 15th August 1947, in order to promote communal harmony and preserve the secular ethos of the nation. This paper adopts a doctrinal methodology, which entails an analysis of statutory provisions, constitutional principles, and significant judgments delivered by courts in respect of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, particularly in respect of sections 3 and 4 thereof, which prohibit conversion and legal actions in respect of the pre-independence era. The paper also reveals the conflict of different constitutional principles, like secularism and public order on one hand, and historical justice, equality, and religious freedom on the other. The research critically examines whether the Act is discriminatory and limits judicial remedies, infringing on fundamental rights under Articles 14, 25, and 26, and also evaluates arguments for the need for the Act as a stabilizing force in a diverse society.
The idea of “religious character” and “once a temple, always a temple” is also
discussed. The research concludes that though it is a tool for maintaining peace at the constitutional level, it needs judicial interpretation, allowing for exceptions in historical cases, so that it does not lose its purpose of preserving peace at the national level.
Keywords Places of Worship Act, 1991; Religious Character; Secularism; Historical Justice; Judicial Review; Fundamental Rights; Articles 14, 25 and 26; Communal Harmony; Status Quo (15 August 1947); Conversion of Places of Worship; Ayodhya Dispute; Gyanvapi Mosque; Krishna Janmabhoomi; Access to Justice; Constitutional Validity
Field Sociology > Administration / Law / Management
Published In Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April 2026
Published On 2026-03-29

Share this