International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Effects of Swiss Ball and Mirror Feedback Therapy Along with Conventional Exercise Therapy in Trunk Control and Balance in Post Stroke Patients
| Author(s) | Dr. Priyanka Mishra |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Background: post-stroke rehabilitation has concentrated on limb functionality, frequently neglecting trunk control, which is essential for postural stability, and functional autonomy. Swiss Ball Therapy and Mirror Feedback Therapy are two new trunk-focused treatments that have shown promise on their own. However, there has not been a direct study to see which one works better for trunk control outcomes.Objectives: This study experiment the effects of Swiss Ball exercises and Mirror Feedback Therapy, each integrated with conventional physiotherapy, on trunk control and balance in post-stroke patients, as assessed by the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS).Results: 30 participants in Both groups exhibited highly significant within-group enhancements in BBS and TIS scores (p=0.000 for all pairs). Group A (Swiss Ball) had a mean TIS gain of 10.87 points (pre: 7.73 ± 1.39; post: 18.60 ± 1.76), and Group B (Mirror Feedback) had a mean BBS gain of 16.60 points (pre: 9.47 ± 1.46; post: 26.07 ± 5.04). The analysis between groups showed a very significant difference in post-intervention TIS scores, with Group A having the better scores (t=4.655, p=0.000). This means that Swiss Ball Therapy worked better for improving trunk control. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in post-intervention BBS scores (t=−1.200, p=0.240), which means that both interventions improved balance in the same way. Conclusion: When used with regular physiotherapy, both Swiss Ball Therapy and Mirror Feedback Therapy are good ways for stroke survivors to get better at trunk-focused rehabilitation. Swiss Ball Therapy showed better results in trunk control (TIS), while Mirror Feedback Therapy showed similar improvements in overall balance (BBS). These results support choosing an individualized intervention based on the main goal of rehabilitation. For example, Swiss Ball Therapy is best when trunk stabilization is the main goal, and Mirror Feedback Therapy is best when overall postural balance is the main goal. It is highly advised to routinely integrate these strategies into post-stroke |
| Keywords | Swiss Ball Exercises, Mirror Feedback Therapy, Trunk Control, Post-Stroke Rehabilitation, Berg Balance Scale, Trunk Impairment Scale, Hemiparesis, Balance. |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-04-16 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals