International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
Legal Frameworks and Patentability Standards for Blockchain Innovations in the USA, European Union, China, and India
| Author(s) | MANDIP KAUR |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This paper conducts a comparative analysis of the legal frameworks and patentability standards for blockchain innovations across the USA, European Union, China, and India. It examines how regulatory regimes and intellectual property policies shape the development, protection, and global competitiveness of blockchain technologies, including distributed ledgers, smart contracts, DeFi, tokenization, and related applications. In the United States, a market-driven and enforcement-oriented approach prevails, with blockchain activities regulated primarily through SEC and CFTC oversight on a case-by-case basis. Patentability follows the Alice-Mayo framework under 35 U.S.C. § 101, requiring blockchain inventions to demonstrate a practical technical improvement beyond abstract ideas or generic computer implementation. Recent USPTO guidance and leadership signals have aimed to support emerging technologies like crypto and blockchain while maintaining rigorous eligibility standards. The European Union emphasizes consumer protection and market integrity through the fully implemented Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which provides a harmonized framework for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), stablecoins, and related activities. Patentability at the European Patent Office demands a clear “technical character” for computer-implemented inventions, prioritizing legal certainty, data privacy, and risk mitigation over unchecked innovation. China pursues a state-centric strategy, prohibiting public cryptocurrencies while aggressively advancing centralized blockchain infrastructure via the Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN) and the digital yuan (e-CNY). The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has historically supported high volumes of blockchain patents aligned with national digital sovereignty goals, though updated 2026 Patent Examination Guidelines introduce stricter standards for AI-related and algorithm-driven inventions, emphasizing inventive step, ethical compliance, and sufficient disclosure. India navigates a transitional regulatory environment, with virtual digital assets (VDAs) subject to Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) obligations, a 30% tax regime, and ongoing CBDC (digital rupee) pilots. Under the Patents Act, 1970, Section 3(k) excludes “computer programs per se,” “mathematical methods,” and “algorithms,” allowing blockchain patents only when they demonstrate a novel technical effect or solve a technical problem, as clarified in the 2025 Guidelines for Computer-Related Inventions (CRI). |
| Keywords | Blockchain innovations, patentability, decentralization, technological transformation , software. |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-04-16 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i02.74944 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals