International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
A Cross-sectional Review on Competitive Study between Conventional and Unconventional Techniques used in Detection of Food Adulteration
| Author(s) | Ms. Divija Pareek, Ms. Ruchika Dwivedi, Dr. Bhawana Jangir, Dr. Geetika Saxena |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Abstract Food adulteration affects public health and erodes confidence in the food supply chain. This article gathers information from studies that have been published so far between 2014 and 2025. It emphasizes detection of adulterants in frequently used foodstuffs such as milk, paneer, ghee, pulses, spices, honey, jaggery, and edible oils. The research categorizes detection techniques into one of three main groups: traditional detection methods, instrumental detection methods, and AI-enabled computational models. Conventional approaches utilize qualitative spot tests according to AAU and FSSAI recommended protocols. Instrumental methods include chromatography, spectroscopy, and electrophoresis. These recent methods employ machine learning algorithms, convolutional neural networks, and hyperspectral imaging. It reviews those techniques in terms of sensitivity, accuracy, cost-effectiveness, speed, and compatibility with different foods. Traditional methods are cheap and accessible, but the results reveal a general lack of precision. Instrumental procedures are considered sensitive and reliable, but they need to be conducted in the laboratory. Models powered by AI show a promising capability to achieve accuracy and speed, but they rely on very large datasets and substantial computational power. The review concludes with identification of gaps in standardization and validation and suggestions for future research focusing on design of portable, scalable, and user friendly detection. |
| Keywords | FSSAI, AAU, Food adulteration, chromatography, spectroscopy, electrophoresis, CNN |
| Field | Biology > Bio + Chemistry |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-04-17 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals