International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Corporate Accountability in the Gig Economy: Re-examining Labour Law to Prevent Digital Slavery
| Author(s) | Mr. Jitendra Singh Kohli, Prof. Dr. Lakshmi Priya Vinjamuri |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This paper examines the growing problem of corporate accountability in the gig economy by critically analysing how digital labour platforms exercise employer-like control while avoiding employer-like legal responsibilities. It argues that the platform economy, often celebrated for flexibility and autonomy, in reality produces a deeply unequal labour structure marked by algorithmic control, economic dependency, surveillance, and lack of social protection. The study shows that gig workers, though formally classified as independent contractors, are functionally subjected to pricing control, performance monitoring, automated penalties, and deactivation mechanisms that closely resemble managerial authority. In this context, the paper uses the concept of “digital slavery” as a normative framework to describe labour conditions shaped by coercive algorithmic management, absence of bargaining power, and structural precarity. It further analyses how platform companies rely on contractual misclassification, corporate structuring, and the legal fiction of neutrality to separate control from liability. Through a comparative study of the United Kingdom, the United States, the European Union, and India, the paper demonstrates that while several jurisdictions have attempted to regulate gig work, most responses remain incomplete and fail to fully address platform accountability. The paper finally proposes a reconstructed labour law framework based on economic dependency rather than traditional employment classification. It advocates recognition of dependent contractor status, platform liability for worker welfare, algorithmic transparency, social security obligations, and specialised grievance mechanisms. The central argument of the paper is that unless labour law evolves to address digitally mediated control and platform-based asymmetry, the gig economy risks normalising exploitative labour conditions under the guise of innovation and flexibility |
| Keywords | Gig economy; corporate accountability; digital slavery; algorithmic management; labour law; platform workers; economic dependency; worker misclassification; social security; platform regulation |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-11 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.76774 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals