International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 3 (May-June 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of June to publish your research paper in the issue of May-June.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Reliability-Weighted Multi-Agent Annotation Workflow for Quality-Controlled LLM Labeling

Author(s) Mr. Sarvagya Jain, Mr. Sandeep Piplotia, Ashish Shrivastava, Brajendra Prajapati
Country India
Abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely adopted for automatically labeling data because they work quickly and can handle large amounts of information. But there are problems like inconsistent results, made-up information, and different levels of reasoning ability across models, which can make the labeling less reliable. To fix these issues, this paper introduces a Multi-Agent Reliability-Weighted Annotation Workflow, a system designed to improve the trust in the labels created by LLMs.
The system uses 3 to 5 different types of LLM agents, each with different structures and ways of generating responses.
Each agent labels data on its own. The system then gives each agent a reliability score based on how well it has performed before, how confident it is in its answers, and how much the agents agree with each other. The final labels are created by combining the agents' results with more weight given to the more reliable ones, rather than just taking the most common answer. Cases where the model is unsure or there is a big disagreement are automatically marked for further checking by a person or for re-labeling.
Tests on datasets like AG News, CoNLL-2003, and SST-20 show that this method improves accuracy by up to 3.4% and increases label agreement by 0.06 compared to simpler methods that don't consider reliability.
Keywords Large Language Models, Data Annotation, Multi-Agent Systems, Reliability Weighting, Quality Control, Weak Supervision, Automated Labeling
Field Computer > Artificial Intelligence / Simulation / Virtual Reality
Published In Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026
Published On 2026-05-07
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.77244
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 1Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 6

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals