International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Revisiting the Insanity Defense: A Comparative Analysis of the M'Naghten Rules and Modern Psychiatric Standards in Criminal Law
| Author(s) | Mr. Arpit Kushwaha |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Insanity defense remains one of the most complex and controversial doctrines in criminal jurisprudence, situated at the intersection of law, morality, and psychiatry. Originating from the landmark 1843 case that led to the formulation of the M'Naghten Rules, the legal standard for insanity has historically focused on the cognitive incapacity of the accused. However, advancements in psychiatric science have significantly broadened the understanding of mental illness, incorporating both cognitive and volitional impairments. This research paper critically examines the continued reliance on the M'Naghten framework in modern criminal justice systems and evaluates its compatibility with contemporary psychiatric standards. Through doctrinal and comparative analysis, the paper highlights the limitations of the traditional legal test, particularly its narrow cognitive focus and its inability to accommodate nuanced psychological conditions. It further explores alternative approaches such as the Model Penal Code test and modern forensic psychiatric evaluations. The study concludes that while the M'Naghten Rules provide doctrinal clarity, they are increasingly inadequate in addressing the complexities of mental health in criminal law, thereby necessitating reform toward a more integrated medico-legal approach. |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-07 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals