International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 3 (May-June 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of June to publish your research paper in the issue of May-June.

Return-to-Sport Criteria After Meniscal Injury: Are Current Functional Tests Enough? A Narrative Review

Author(s) Dr. Kapil Kumar Garg (PT), Mr. Rahul Yadav, Prof. Dr. Aditi Singh, Dr. Kartikeya Vahal (PT)
Country India
Abstract Background
Meniscal Injury represents one of the most common intra-articular knee pathologies among athletes participating in pivoting, cutting, jumping, and contact sports. Although surgical techniques and rehabilitation strategies have advanced substantially, determining readiness for return-to-sport (RTS) remains clinically challenging. Current RTS decisions often rely on time-based milestones, symptom resolution, and functional performance tests; however, these criteria may not adequately capture biomechanical, neuromuscular, psychological, and sport-specific recovery.
Objective
To critically evaluate contemporary evidence regarding RTS criteria following meniscal injury, with specific emphasis on whether currently used functional tests are sufficient to determine safe return to athletic participation.
Methods
A narrative literature review was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar. Literature published between 2010 and 2026 was screened using predefined search terms related to meniscal injury, rehabilitation, functional testing, sports participation, and RTS decision-making. Randomized studies, cohort studies, systematic reviews, consensus statements, and clinical guidelines were included.
Key Findings
Current RTS decision-making following meniscal injury remains highly heterogeneous. Most published protocols rely predominantly on time-based recovery, range of motion, pain-free function, quadriceps strength, and hop performance tests. Recent evidence suggests that isolated functional tests may fail to identify residual deficits in movement quality, neuromuscular control, psychological readiness, and tissue healing status. Multidimensional RTS frameworks appear more clinically relevant than isolated performance metrics.
Conclusion
Existing functional tests provide valuable information but appear insufficient as standalone RTS criteria following meniscal injury. Integration of biomechanical assessment, psychological readiness, movement analysis, and sport-specific loading assessment may improve decision-making and reduce reinjury risk.
Keywords Meniscal injury; return to sport; functional testing; rehabilitation; sports physiotherapy; knee biomechanics.
Field Medical / Pharmacy
Published In Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026
Published On 2026-05-14
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.78325

Share this