International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Return-to-Sport Criteria After Meniscal Injury: Are Current Functional Tests Enough? A Narrative Review
| Author(s) | Dr. Kapil Kumar Garg (PT), Mr. Rahul Yadav, Prof. Dr. Aditi Singh, Dr. Kartikeya Vahal (PT) |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Background Meniscal Injury represents one of the most common intra-articular knee pathologies among athletes participating in pivoting, cutting, jumping, and contact sports. Although surgical techniques and rehabilitation strategies have advanced substantially, determining readiness for return-to-sport (RTS) remains clinically challenging. Current RTS decisions often rely on time-based milestones, symptom resolution, and functional performance tests; however, these criteria may not adequately capture biomechanical, neuromuscular, psychological, and sport-specific recovery. Objective To critically evaluate contemporary evidence regarding RTS criteria following meniscal injury, with specific emphasis on whether currently used functional tests are sufficient to determine safe return to athletic participation. Methods A narrative literature review was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar. Literature published between 2010 and 2026 was screened using predefined search terms related to meniscal injury, rehabilitation, functional testing, sports participation, and RTS decision-making. Randomized studies, cohort studies, systematic reviews, consensus statements, and clinical guidelines were included. Key Findings Current RTS decision-making following meniscal injury remains highly heterogeneous. Most published protocols rely predominantly on time-based recovery, range of motion, pain-free function, quadriceps strength, and hop performance tests. Recent evidence suggests that isolated functional tests may fail to identify residual deficits in movement quality, neuromuscular control, psychological readiness, and tissue healing status. Multidimensional RTS frameworks appear more clinically relevant than isolated performance metrics. Conclusion Existing functional tests provide valuable information but appear insufficient as standalone RTS criteria following meniscal injury. Integration of biomechanical assessment, psychological readiness, movement analysis, and sport-specific loading assessment may improve decision-making and reduce reinjury risk. |
| Keywords | Meniscal injury; return to sport; functional testing; rehabilitation; sports physiotherapy; knee biomechanics. |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-14 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.78325 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals