International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Terms of References a Tool to Control Finance Commission
| Author(s) | V V S S Praveena |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The President of India holds significant fiscal powers under the Constitution, particularly in matters related to financial distribution between the Union and the States. These powers include the appointment of the Finance Commission under Article 280, setting its Terms of Reference (ToR), and deciding on tax devolution and grants-in-aid based on the Commission’s recommendations. The intent of the Constituent Assembly in granting these powers was to ensure financial stability, equitable distribution of resources, and a mechanism to balance Union-State fiscal relations. The framers envisioned that the Finance Commission would serve as an independent expert body guiding financial allocations, while the President would act as a constitutional authority to implement these recommendations in a fair and non-political manner. However, in practice, the President’s power in framing ToRs has often been influenced by the Union Government’s fiscal and political priorities, leading to concerns over financial centralization. Over time, the scope of Finance Commissions has expanded beyond tax-sharing to include broader economic policies, sometimes imposing conditions that favor Union interests over State autonomy. Notable instances, such as the Fifteenth Finance Commission’s ToR, which included defense funding and demographic changes, have sparked criticism that the Finance Commission is being used as a policy tool rather than an independent fiscal body. This paper examines the evolution of presidential power in financial matters, the shifting role of the Finance Commission, and the implications of ToR modifications on India’s fiscal federalism, highlighting the need for greater transparency, State consultation, and institutional safeguards to preserve the original intent of the Constitution. |
| Keywords | fiscal federalism, TOR , finance commission, constituent assembly, taxing powers, |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-18 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals