International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Articaine in Pediatric Dentistry: A Literature Review
| Author(s) | Dr. Devadhakshayani Venkatesan, Dr. Pradeep Daniel Gainneos, Dr. Manjari Pandian, Dr. Ekta Manohar Pendurkar, Dr. Muthusri B, Dr Aparna Vishnuvarthan |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Aim: Reviewing and summarizing articaine's pharmacological characteristics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile as a local anesthetic agent in pediatric dentistry, with a focus on its benefits over more conventional drugs like lidocaine Materials and Methods: An extensive literature review and material analysis were conducted, including studies published between 2015 and 2025. Analysis was done on pertinent clinical studies, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and pediatric dentistry guidelines assessing the use of articaine in children. Key parameters assessed included anesthetic efficacy, onset and duration, diffusion capability, success in infiltration versus block anesthesia, safety outcomes, and reported adverse effects. Results: Articaine provides faster onset, greater bone penetration, and higher success rates in both maxillary and mandibular infiltrations compared to lidocaine. Many studies demonstrate that articaine infiltration can replace inferior alveolar nerve blocks, reducing injection-related anxiety and complications. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses confirm superior or comparable anesthetic efficacy to lidocaine, especially in primary molars and pulpal procedures. Conclusion: In pediatric dentistry, articaine has proven to be a reliable and safe local anesthetic. Its superior bone penetration, rapid onset, and reliable pulpal anesthesia provide significant advantages over lidocaine, particularly for infiltrations in mandibular teeth. While its use in children under 4 years requires caution, articaine remains a valuable option in pediatric dental practice. To solidify its long-term safety and effectiveness profile in children, more excellent randomized trials are required. |
| Keywords | Articaine ; Pediatric dentistry; Local anesthesia; Anesthetic efficacy |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-18 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.78774 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals