International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Bodies in Control: Gender, Power, and Social Exclusion in The Handmaid’s Tale and “Khol Do”
| Author(s) | Ms. Lakshita Arora |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Set against the dystopian theocracy of Gilead and the socio-political upheaval of the partition era in South Asia, the texts The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood and Khol Do by Saadat Hasan Manto respectively focus on how women’s bodies are reduced to functional objects within systems structured by gendered, classed, and socio-political hierarchies. This paper takes a comparative analysis approach towards the representation of women’s bodies as sites of control, violence, and ideological inscription in both texts. By drawing on Michael Foucault’s concept of disciplinary power, the paper explores how institutional hierarchy and power, and social forces control, regulate, and produce “docile bodies” through constant surveillance, ritual, and violence. In contrast to The Handmaid’s Tale, where a female’s body is codified under a strict theocratic structure that governs reproduction and identity through religious dogma and ideological discourse, Saadat Hasan Manto’s Khol Do reveals a more chaotic yet equally systemic form of bodily control (that of females), where caste, class vulnerability, and the breakdown of social order during partition render Sakin’s body susceptible to repeated violation. Through Judith Butler’s theory of performativity, this paper further examines the system through which women are compelled to enact according to the state-imposed identities through continuous bodily practices - whether that is through state-sanctioned rape of the handmaid’s of the conditioned response of Sakina to the command “khol do.” Additionally, this paper also includes Barbara Creed’s notion of the “monstrous feminine” that enables an understanding of how the female body is construed as a site of control, fear, and moral regulation within patriarchal discourse. The comparative reading of the texts highlights how literature across different contexts reveals the consistent intersections of gendered oppression with class and social hierarchy, while also emphasising the need to re-examine the conditions under which women’s bodies are held hostage for hierarchies and systems to persist. |
| Keywords | Religious dogma, ideology discourse, gender, class, social hierarchy |
| Field | Arts |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-18 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals