International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
A Causal-Comparative Study of Flexible Learning Modalities on Mathematical Comprehension among Second-Year College Students
| Author(s) | Irish Bercide Tan, Gemma M. Valdez |
|---|---|
| Country | Philippines |
| Abstract | This study compared the impact of flexible learning modalities on the mathematical comprehension of second-year college students enrolled in "Mathematics in the Modern World." While the target population consisted of 106 students, the final analysis included 98 participants (62 from the face-to-face group and 36 from the synchronous group) due to non-response, incomplete submissions, or absences during testing. Using a Quantitative Comparative Research Design, the research compared students' cognitive performance in face-to-face (BSED) and synchronous online (BEED) settings. Quantitative results from a 30-item comprehension test revealed a significant difference in performance (p=0.009), with the face-to-face group (M=12.18) outperforming the synchronous group (M=10.46). The findings suggest that face-to-face instruction remains more effective for fostering mathematical comprehension than synchronous online settings. However, the fact that both cohorts remained at a low proficiency level indicates that the mode of delivery is not the only factor at play. Foundational gaps in mathematical knowledge, curriculum alignment, and student readiness are significant contributors to poor performance, suggesting that simply changing the modality is insufficient to fully resolve comprehension difficulties. |
| Keywords | Mathematical Comprehension, Flexible Learning Modalities, Synchronous Learning, Face-to-Face Instruction, Mixed-Methods Research. |
| Field | Mathematics |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-18 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.78851 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals